HISTORY Of KHMER TEMPLES
|
'Syam
Kuk' Siamese mercenaries in Suryavarman II 's army, south
gallery of Angkor Wat
|
An inscription of 1186 from Sai Fong, on the Mekong near Vientiane,
is the mast northerly known. 12th and 13th century Chinese accounts
(the Ling-wai Tai-ta of 1178, and that of Chao Ju-kua of 1225) relate
that Khmer control extended into present-day Burma end part of the
Malay Peninsula, The last large Khmer settlement discovered in Thailand
is that of Muang Singh, west of The Chao Phraya near present-day
Kanchanaburi. Although hastily built in laterite, with only traces
remaining of the stucco work with which it was decorated, the sanctuary
and surrounding earthen ramparts indicate that this was an important
foundation, its settlement no doubt guarding the western frontier.
Other constructions of the period, for which The style is that
of the Bayon, are hospitals and rest-houses a1ong The major roads,
The 1191 stele at Preah Khan, the temple consecrated 10 the memory
of Jayavarman VII' s father, describes 121 "house, with fire"
- the rest-houses or way-stations built a day's walk apart from
each other (approximately 15 km). In addition, the stele of Ta Prohm,
consecrated to the memory of Jayavarman VII 's mother, mentions
102 hospitals. One of the principal routes of the Empire was the
rood leading north-west from Angkor to Phimai, passing the important
temples of Ta Muen Thom, Muang Tam and Phnom Rung. Along this road
17 rest-houses were built, of which eight have been found. At the
Ta Muen Pass are two of the best-preserved chapels of these constructions:
that of Ta Muen from the rest-house and that of Ta Muen Toch from
the hospital.
The art of this Bayon period is Buddhist in inspiration, and the
statuary found in Thailand is extensive, One very distinctive form
of statue is of a seated heavy-set man, hair pulled back into a
chignon, with closed eyes and a faint smile indicating on inner
Buddhist peace - not dissimilar from the expression on The face-towers.
Several such statues - or parts - hove been found, one of them in
Thailand, and they ore c1earlv on idealised portrait of the king.
In addition, stone Buddhas under nagas abound, and numerous bronzes
of the Buddha, bodhisattvas and Buddhist deities From Muang Singh
ore two important stone statues of the so-called 'radiating' Lokesvara.
The end of Jayavarman VII 's reign effectively marks the end of
Khmer building in permanent materials, and thus the end of The remains
known to us. Even more significant in The Chao Phraya volley and
on the Khorat Plateau is that Jayavormcl1 VII 's death around 1220
coincides with the break-away from Angkor. Although the dates are
uncertain, The beginnings what Louis Finot coiled the Tai "inundation"
were about this time. The start of the century saw the foundation
of small Tai principalities in present-day Laos and the Shan States
of Burma; by its end the Tai had moved into, and token control of,
the northern and central parts of the Chao Phraya valley and its
tributaries. In 1287, the three Tai rulers Mengrai of Chiangmai,
Ngan Muang of Phayao and Ramkhamhaeng of Sukhothai concluded their
famous treaty, and the Siamese era had begun Sukhothai, which had
been a provincial Khmer seat, must have fallen to the Siamese around
the time of the death of Jayavarman VII. During This period Louvo
also must hove been taken, or else declared its independence from
Angkor, for if sent its own embassies once more to China between
1289 and 1299. The last account to report the Khmer in control of
provinces beyond lowland Cambodia is Chao Ju-kua's Chu•fon•chih
in 1225, which includes Lo-hu (Louvo) and P' u-kan (Pagan) among
its dependencies What happened on the Khorat Plateau is unknown,
but linguistically at least, a belt of Khmer speakers still occupies
the southern part of the plateau.
The Angkorean period continued for two more centuries, and while
the provinces had gained their independence, and there was no further
building of significance in Cambodia after Jayavarman VII, the Empire
still flourished The famous account of Angkor at the end of the
13th century, written by Chou Ta-Kuan, records the life of a prosperous
city, dominated by magnificent temples "which hove caused merchants
from overseas to speak so often of 'Cambodia the rich and noble'
".
However, the end of Angkor was already in sight, as the Siamese
, with their newly consolidated power in the central Chao Phraya
valley, began to harass the Khmers. In his same account, Chou Ta-Kuan
mentions "I have heard it said that in war with the Siamese
universal military service was required". Siamese chronicles,
though of suspect reliability, give two dales, 1352 and 1394, on
which Ayutthayan armies succeeded in taking Angkor Thereafter, nothing
is known of The wars between The two nations until the final indisputable
socking of Angkor in 1431, 'when the Khmer king Dhammashokaraja
was killed. The city was abandoned after this forever as being too
difficult to defend.
The Khmer legacy in Thailand was considerable. Some Khmer sites,
such as Sukhothai and Si Satchanalai, were retained by the Siamese
as foundations for their own cities and temple. The immediate response
in The 13th century appears to have been a reaction against Khmer
design. Under Ramkhamhaeng al Sukhothai, Siamese art, architecture
and political systems seem to hove developed in deliberate contrast
Khmer authoritarianism, although Siamese script, the invention of
which is attributed to Ramkhamhaeng, was derived directly from the
more complex Khmer system. When Ayutthaya become the centre of Siamese
power, the pendulum began to swing back with a full•blown
Khmer Revival, which coincided with The campaigns against Angkor
(1350 to 1430) This deliberate return to Khmer influence was felt
in sculpture (the U Thong school), architecture (the evolution of
the Tai prong from the Khmer sanctuary towers) and in the political
and administrative system, focused on a monarchy that revived the
claims for divine power.
|